![]() In this instance, results cannot be grouped by number of productivity modules, as the speed is also important. Pumpjacks only have two module slots, so all combinations will be shown. Since pumpjacks operate on an infinite resource that has a finite count (oil wells), results will be shown in kW instead of kJ, since the goal here is to produce as much power as possible. The higher the level, the less effective productivity modules become. It is also important to note that pumpjacks are affected by mining productivity level. Using the minimum amount is important to prove that creating power from crude oil is always possible. As the amount of crude oil increases, the importance of optimal modules decreases since the power draw for a given amount of oil output also decreases. Results will be given for a depleted oil well, which provides 2 crude oil per second. Since energy costs per cycle will be the same as above but scaled (same module slot count), only the optimal combination per number of productivity modules will be shown.Ħ06,578/11kJ × 1.3 - 534,200/111kJ = 408,265,027/6,105kJīased on the above table, 100 crude oil will be given an energy worth of 9,955,904/165kJ, since this is the optimal amount of power that can be made when converting into solid fuel in non-beaconed setup. Since advanced oil processing produces more overall, its total fuel value will be used.Ĭombinations without productivity modules are omitted, since the first combination produces more net energy per cycle than the total fuel value. Since all products scale equally based on productivity, each recipe can be expressed solely as the fuel value of the products combined and that value can be scaled based on productivity below. Petroleum gas = 340kJ (half of light oil).Heavy oil = 32,139/55kJ (based on optimal non-beaconed conversion to light oil).Based on the above tables, the following fuel values for each product will be used: Since the solid fuel is being used in a closed loop, and therefore is going into boilers, the 25MJ fuel value is halved when used.Ĭombinations without productivity modules are omitted, since the first combination produces more net energy per cycle than a single piece of solid fuel is worth.Ĭombinations for each number of productivity modules show their best combination in bold, and only that combination is used to work out energy gained per cycle.Ĭrude oil can be processed with either basic or advanced oil processing. This table shows the results of various module combinations for a single cycle of the chemical plant for either light oil or petroleum. Light oil is not cracked since it takes twice as much petroleum gas to make one solid fuel. Petroleum gas and light oil will be used as-is for producing solid fuel. Light oil and petroleum gas into solid fuel Power cost and power results will be worked out in reverse, with the result that gives the most power being used for each step thereafter. 2 Converting solid fuel into rocket fuel. ![]() 1.1 Light oil and petroleum gas into solid fuel. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |